Observational analysis shows no impact on peak torque or fatigue in strength-trained women, suggesting hormonal fluctuations may not influence performance.
The effects of estradiol and progesterone fluctuations during the menstrual cycle (MC) on strength and fatigue remain unclear. This study investigated their impact on peak torque and fatigue in isokinetic tests. Eleven strength-trained women performed five knee extensions and flexions to assess maximum peak torque, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and rating of perceived pain (RPP). A separate protocol of sixty repetitions was used to evaluate peak torque, total work, percentage of work fatigue, RPE, RPP, and blood lactate concentration before and after exercise. MC phases were determined using a combination of calendar tracking, urinary ovulation tests, and serum hormone analysis. A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc tests and effect size calculations (partial eta-square), analyzed differences across six MC phases. No significant differences were observed in peak torque, RPE, or RPP during knee extension and flexion (p > 0.05). Similarly, fatigue parameters assessed during the sixty-repetition test showed no significant variation across MC phases (p > 0.05). However, blood lactate concentrations were significantly higher post-exercise than pre-exercise (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that strength performance and muscle fatigue are not influenced by hormonal fluctuations across the MC in strength-trained women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Velten et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: