July 2, 2025Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences

The Dimension and Limit of Criminal Sanction Thinking of Artificial Intelligence "Deep Counterfeiting"

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The existing criminal law can adapt to cover various crimes linked to deep forgery, emphasizing the interpretation of defamation and obscene materials.
Judicial interpretation may lower criminalization thresholds, ensuring comprehensive protection of personal information rights in the context of new technologies.
Combining technology and law through a collaborative governance approach is essential to manage risks while fostering innovation safely.
Legislative improvements, particularly in biometric data protections, are necessary to address challenges posed by identity fraud and obscene video forgery.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Comparative law research highlights the need for judicial optimization in criminal regulation of deep forgery technologies, indicating potential legal reforms.

Cite This Study

Ni Lin (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af6d967567bf4f94feb434 https://doi.org/10.54097/nf4nnr15

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Comparative law research highlights the need for judicial optimization in criminal regulation of deep forgery technologies, indicating potential legal reforms.

The Dimension and Limit of Criminal Sanction Thinking of Artificial Intelligence "Deep Counterfeiting"

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

The Dimension and Limit of Criminal Sanction Thinking of Artificial Intelligence "Deep Counterfeiting"

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading