August 20, 2025International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

Advocacy coalitions and social policy making in Iran: the Education 2030 Agenda

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Rival coalitions influenced the Education 2030 Agenda's trajectory within Iran's authoritarian regime, and differed in policy-core beliefs, shaping outcomes.
The analysis focused on 874 documents and key actors, uncovering significant power dynamics among state-affiliated players across the educational policy landscape.
Despite ideological similarities, the absence of civil society indicated that political authority and power dynamics were crucial in determining policy outcomes.
Findings suggest the Advocacy Coalition Framework remains relevant in nondemocratic contexts, revealing how policies can be legitimized and implemented.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Qualitative analysis reveals state institutions shape education policy in an authoritarian regime, highlighting coalition strategies impacting outcomes.

Cite This Study

Qarakhani et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4088cf1dd9ea359ebf03 https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-04-2025-0249

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Qualitative analysis reveals state institutions shape education policy in an authoritarian regime, highlighting coalition strategies impacting outcomes.

Advocacy coalitions and social policy making in Iran: the Education 2030 Agenda

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Advocacy coalitions and social policy making in Iran: the Education 2030 Agenda

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider