Statistical design uncovers optimal heat treatment for hardness and ductility in Vanadis 60 steel, indicating performance trade-offs.
This study investigates the influence of key heat treatment parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the powder metallurgy tool steel Vanadis 60. A fractional factorial design of experiments was applied to evaluate the effects of austenitising temperature, quenching medium, tempering temperature, and number of tempering cycles on hardness, flexural strength, and microstructure, using detailed phase characterisation by X-ray diffraction. The results reveal two distinct processing routes tailored to different performance objectives. Maximum hardness was achieved by combining austenitisation at 1180 °C, rapid oil quenching, and tempering at 560 °C. These conditions enhance the solubility of carbon and other alloying elements, promote secondary hardening, and reduce retained austenite. Conversely, higher toughness and ductility were obtained by austenitising at 1020 °C, air cooling, and tempering at 560 °C. These parameters favour the formation of a bainitic microstructure, together with lower martensite tetragonality and minimal retained austenite. A statistically significant interaction was identified between the austenitising temperature and the number of tempering cycles; three temperings were sufficient to compensate for the lower hardness associated with reduced austenitising temperatures. The results provide a robust guidance for optimising thermal processing in highly alloyed tool steels, enabling the precise tailoring of microstructure and properties in accordance with specific mechanical service requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Álvarez-Antolín et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: