Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 19, 2025Majelis

Dualisme Penanganan Anak Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual dalam Perspektif UU SPPA dan UU Perlindungan Anak

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DVDepasbond VijayaTATri AndrismanSRSri Riski

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This analysis highlights inconsistencies in handling child offenders under laws No. 11 of 2012 and No. 35 of 2014, suggesting improved coordination.

Key Points

  • There are inconsistencies in applying restorative justice principles, leading to unfair outcomes for child offenders.
  • The analysis shows differences between Law No. 11 of 2012 and Law No. 35 of 2014 in addressing these cases and protecting children.
  • Using a normative and empirical approach, the study examines how laws impact children as offenders and what needs to change.
  • Improving the capacity of law enforcement and harmonizing regulations can promote fair treatment and recovery for child offenders.

Cite This Study

Vijaya et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af33d5cf1dd9ea359e88c9https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v2i3.1086
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Pasal Kekerasan Seksual pada Kasus Pelecehan Anak di Bawah Umur2025
  2. 2Legal Review of the Process of Handling Cases of Sexual Violence Against Children2025
  3. 3Legal Protection of Child Victims of Sexual Crimes in the Perspective of Criminal Law2025
  4. 4Analisis Pengaturan Sanksi Pidana terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perundungan2025
  5. 5ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2627/PID.Sus/2019/PN.Sby)2025 · 1 citations