August 18, 2025Frontiers in MedicineOpen Access

A scoping review of mentorship in Graduate Medical Education: a proposed conceptual framework

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Mentorship programs show significant variability in structure and effectiveness, impacting clinical competency and professional growth.
Only 27 out of 94 studies utilized theoretical frameworks and many lacked validated evaluation tools, calling for improvement in assessment methods.
The review employed a comprehensive scoping methodology across multiple databases to evaluate mentorship in graduate medical education contexts.
This highlights the necessity for clearly defined mentorship models and the application of equity considerations within GME programs.

Authors

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Scoping review reveals gaps in mentorship structure and evaluation in graduate medical education, suggesting a need for standardized frameworks.

Abdelmannan et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Scoping review reveals gaps in mentorship structure and evaluation in graduate medical education, suggesting a need for standardized frameworks.