Penerapan Unsur Tindak Pidana Pasal 379a KUHP “Penipuan sebagai Mata Pencaharian”

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Recognition of habit elements is crucial for applying Article 379a effectively, ensuring proper legal outcomes.
Objective evidence, including fraud patterns, plays a significant role in the successful prosecution of fraud cases.
Subjective evidence, such as the intent to use fraud as a livelihood, is essential for legal interpretations in these cases.
The study highlights the integration of empirical data with legal requirements, addressing gaps in previous research.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Normative legal analysis reveals key evidence requirements in fraud cases related to livelihood, suggesting a need for clear proof.

Adam et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark