Geodetic observations reveal significant seasonal and interannual variations in terrestrial water storage, suggesting ENSO impacts.
The Amazon Basin plays a crucial role in the global hydrological cycle, where seasonal and interannual variations in terrestrial water storage (TWS) are essential for understanding climate–hydrology coupling mechanisms. This study utilizes data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission and its follow-on mission (GRACE-FO, collectively referred to as GRACE) to investigate the spatiotemporal dynamics of hydrological mass changes in the Amazon Basin from 2002 to 2021. Results reveal pronounced spatial heterogeneity in the annual amplitude of TWS, exceeding 65 cm near the Amazon River and decreasing to less than 25 cm in peripheral mountainous regions. This distribution likely reflects the interplay between precipitation and topography. Vertical displacement measurements from the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) show strong correlations with GRACE-derived hydrological load deformation (mean Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.72) and reduce its root mean square (RMS) by 35%. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that existing hydrological models, which neglect groundwater dynamics, underestimate hydrological load deformation. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the Amazon GNSS network demonstrates that the first principal component (PC) of GNSS vertical displacement aligns with abrupt interannual TWS fluctuations identified by GRACE during 2010–2011, 2011–2012, 2013–2014, 2015–2016, and 2020–2021. These fluctuations coincide with extreme precipitation events associated with the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), confirming that ENSO modulates basin-scale interannual hydrological variability primarily through precipitation anomalies. This study provides new insights for predicting extreme hydrological events under climate warming and offers a methodological framework applicable to other critical global hydrological regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: