August 9, 2025CancersOpen Access

Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance of PET/MR Versus CECT in Determining Resectability in Ovarian Cancer

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

PET/MR achieved 55.5% sensitivity and 89.5% specificity, indicating strong performance in detecting metastases.
CT demonstrated 75.0% sensitivity and 91.5% negative predictive value, illustrating its effectiveness for certain findings.
Assessment utilized imaging from 19 patients with suspected metastatic involvement, confirming the value of pathology as a reference.
Results suggest combining PET/MR and CT may enhance detection and offer a more accurate evaluation of metastatic spread.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Analysis compares diagnostic performance of PET/MR and CECT in identifying metastatic disease, suggesting improved assessment methods.

Virarkar et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark