Life cycle assessment reveals greenhouse gas emissions in hydrogen production, highlighting environmental hotspots.
This study evaluates the environmental sustainability of hydrogen production from high-calorific mixed waste gasification through a Cradle-to-Gate(CtG) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) based on operational data from a 2 TPD pilot plant. The Global Warming Potential (GWP) was calculated to be 9.80 kg CO2-eq per kg of H2 produced. This carbon footprint is competitive with conventional steam methane reforming (SMR) and lower than coal gasification, but significantly higher than biomass-based pathways. A contribution analysis identified the primary environmental hotspots as external electricity consumption (39.3%), production of chelated iron for syngas cleaning (18.8%), externally supplied oxygen (17.9%), and plant construction (11.9%). These findings position this Waste-to-Hydrogen (WtH) technology as a strategic transitional solution, offering the dual benefit of valorizing problematic waste and producing a valuable energy carrier. While not yet a 'green' hydrogen source, the identification of clear environmental hotspots provides actionable pathways for improving its sustainability, primarily through enhancing energy self-sufficiency and optimizing consumable usage. This research provides a critical empirical benchmark for the technology's future development and commercialization, bridging the gap between laboratory research and industrial application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: