Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 1, 2025Open Access

Rewriting the Politics of Publication: Tracking 25 Years of Debate in Academic Reform with Bibliometric Analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

TWTarid WongvorachanSNSuchada Naknarin

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Bibliometric analysis identifies key trends in academic publishing challenges, suggesting shifts in discourse on equity and integrity.

Key Points

  • MAIN FINDING: The analysis reveals evolving debates on academic publishing reform over the past 25 years.
  • KEY EVIDENCE: Significant themes include editorial gatekeeping and the impact of prestige-driven evaluation metrics.
  • APPROACH: A three-fold bibliometric analysis of literature from 2000 to 2025 using structured searches in Scopus.
  • SIGNIFICANCE: This work informs future reforms, promoting a more equitable and transparent academic publishing landscape.

Cite This Study

Wongvorachan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0c65e6551bb0af8cfb8dhttps://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202507.2644.v1
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Within the Numbers: Rethinking Bibliometric Evaluation in Academic Medicine2025
  2. 2The shapeshifting landscape of academic publishing in pediatrics: focus on Open Access2025
  3. 3Bibliometric Mapping of Academic Library Research: Trends and Influences in the Journal of Academic Librarianship2024
  4. 4Cultures of humanities publishing: Introducing the PACE-index to understand diversity and conformity in scholarly communication2025
  5. 5The Gatekeepers of Academia: Investigating Bias in Journal Publication Across Topics, Author Backgrounds, and Institutions2025