Field trials demonstrate controlled-release urea enhances nitrogen use efficiency and reduces environmental impact in maize, suggesting a sustainable farming practice.
Controlled-release urea (CRU) offers potential for improving nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in intensive maize systems, but comprehensive evaluations of its agronomic, physiological, and environmental impacts remain limited. Through a two-year field experiment in the North China Plain comparing three CRU types (polymer/sulfur-coated PSCU, thermosetting polymer-coated TCU, and polymer-coated PCU) with conventional urea at five N rates (0-280 kg N ha–1), we demonstrate that CRU at 180 kg N ha–1 maintained high maize yields (13.9 Mg ha–1) while reducing N inputs by 12-19% and improving NUE by 37.6%, with TCU showing superior performance. The significant increase in Pn by 7.9–32.7% and Ci by 20.6–40.0% under CRU during the silking and milking stages. The CRU treatments also sustained optimal levels of hormones, N metabolism enzymes, sucrase and urease activities. Compared to common urea, life cycle assessment indicates that CRU has achieved a 47.5% reduction in reactive nitrogen losses, primarily due to lower ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching. Additionally, when compared to common urea, CRU has resulted in a 18.7% decrease in greenhouse gas emissions. Economically, CRU outperformed common urea, with TCU providing the highest net benefit through yield stability and labor savings. These findings establish TCU at 180 kg N ha–1 as an optimal strategy for sustainable intensification of maize production in the NCP, balancing productivity, profitability and environmental protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: